|
|
|
The Work of The CommitteeThe work of the Committee is split between reactive (for instance, we look at specific licence applications and promote scientific developments such as the 3R’s (reduction, refinement and replacement) and pro-active (for example, advising on policy and practice). Our objective, in all our tasks, is to offer independent, expert and balanced advice in relation to the use of animals for experimental purposes. There are some misconceptions about our role in the licensing process. We do not see most licence applications. It is the role of the Home Office Animals (Scientific Procedures) Inspectorate to assess applications and to advise the Home Secretary on whether they should be granted and, if so, on what terms. We do, however, see all applications for project licences that involve:
The Committee cannot grant or refuse licence applications. Our role is, instead, to advise the Home Secretary on the few applications that we see - we give him our advice as to whether they should be granted and, if so, on any particular conditions they should have. During the last few years we have published reports on the feasibility of reporting data on the severity of scientific procedures and Review of Schedule 1 of the Animal (Scientific Procedures) Act – appropriate methods of humane killing. We have also advised on Consideration for the discharge of GA animals from the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, the Ethical Review Process and personal licensing and mandatory training in relation to better regulation. The meetings of the main Committee are regularly attended by the Head of the Home Office Animal (Scientific Procedures) Division A(SP)D and by the Chief Inspector and other members of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Inspectorate (ASPI). A member of the secretariat and an inspector also take part in sub-committee meetings. The Home Office Chief Scientific Adviser also occasionally attends our main meetings |
|
|
|
|
© Crown Copyright 2009 |
|